A Model for Evaluating Total Costs of Care and Cost Savings of Specialty Condition-Based Care for Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis in an Integrated Practice Unit.

OBJECTIVES: The viability of specialty condition-based care via integrated practice units (IPUs) requires a comprehensive understanding of total costs of care. Our primary objective was to introduce a model to evaluate costs and potential costs savings using time-driven activity-based costing comparing IPU-based nonoperative management with traditional nonoperative management and IPU-based operative management with traditional operative management for hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA). Secondarily, we assess drivers of incremental cost differences between IPU-based care and traditional care. Finally, we model potential cost savings through diverting patients from traditional operative management to IPU-based nonoperative management. METHODS: We developed a model to evaluate costs using time-driven activity-based costing for hip and knee OA care pathways within a musculoskeletal IPU compared with traditional care. We identified differences in costs and drivers of cost differences and developed a model to demonstrate potential cost savings through diverting patients from operative intervention. RESULTS: Weighted average costs of IPU-based nonoperative management were lower than traditional nonoperative management and lower in IPU-based operative management than traditional operative management. Key drivers of incremental cost savings included care led by surgeons in partnership with associate providers, modified physical therapy programs with self-management, and judicious use of intra-articular injections. Substantial savings were modeled by diverting patients toward IPU-based nonoperative management. CONCLUSIONS: Costing models involving musculoskeletal IPUs demonstrate favorable costs and cost savings compared with traditional management of hip or knee OA. More effective team-based care and utilization of evidence-based nonoperative strategies can drive the financial viability of these innovative care models.

Association of Unmet Social Needs With Level of Capability in People With Persistent Knee Pain.

BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal providers are increasingly recognizing the importance of social factors and their association with health outcomes as they aim to develop more comprehensive models of care delivery. Such factors may account for some of the unexplained variation between pathophysiology and level of pain intensity and incapability experienced by people with common conditions, such as persistent nontraumatic knee pain secondary to osteoarthritis (OA). Although the association of one's social position (for example, income, employment, or education) with levels of pain and capability are often assessed in OA research, the relationship between aspects of social context (or unmet social needs) and such symptomatic and functional outcomes in persistent knee pain are less clear. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Are unmet social needs associated with the level of capability in patients experiencing persistently painful nontraumatic knee conditions, accounting for sociodemographic factors? (2) Do unmet health-related social needs correlate with self-reported quality of life? METHODS: We performed a prospective, cross-sectional study between January 2021 and August 2021 at a university academic medical center providing comprehensive care for patients with persistent lower extremity joint pain secondary to nontraumatic conditions such as age-related knee OA. A final 125 patients were included (mean age 62 ± 10 years, 65% [81 of 125] women, 47% [59 of 125] identifying as White race, 36% [45 of 125] as Hispanic or Latino, and 48% [60 of 125] with safety-net insurance or Medicaid). We measured patient-reported outcomes of knee capability (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement), quality of life (Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Information System [PROMIS] Global Physical Health and PROMIS Global Mental Health), and unmet social needs (Accountable Health Communities Health-Related Social Needs Survey, accounting for insufficiencies related to housing, food, transportation, utilities, and interpersonal violence), as well as demographic factors. RESULTS: After controlling for demographic factors such as insurance status, education attained, and household income, we found that reduced knee-specific capability was moderately associated with experiencing unmet social needs (including food insecurity, housing instability, transportation needs, utility needs, or interpersonal safety) (standardized beta regression coefficient [ß] = -4.8 [95% confidence interval -7.9 to -1.7]; p = 0.002 and substantially associated with unemployment (ß = -13 [95% CI -23 to -3.8]; p = 0.006); better knee-specific capability was substantially associated with having Medicare insurance (ß = 12 [95% CI 0.78 to 23]; p = 0.04). After accounting for factors such as insurance status, education attained, and household income, we found that older age was associated with better general mental health (ß = 0.20 [95% CI 0.0031 to 0.39]; p = 0.047) and with better physical health (ß = 0.004 [95% CI 0.0001 to 0.008]; p = 0.04), but effect sizes were small to negligible, respectively. CONCLUSION: There is an association of unmet social needs with level of capability and unemployment in patients with persistent nontraumatic knee pain. This finding signals a need for comprehensive care delivery for patients with persistent knee pain that screens for and responds to potentially modifiable social risk factors, including those based on one's social circumstances and context, to achieve better outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prognostic study.

Editorial Commentary: The Value of Time-Driven, Activity-Based Costing in Health Care Delivery.

Time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) provides a powerful approach to more targeted cost accounting based on resources actually used by patients during a cycle of care. Since its introduction in 2004 by Kaplan and Anderson, TDABC has gained increasing popularity in defining the actual costs of care for various orthopaedic processes and pathways. TDABC may demonstrate lower costs of care compared with traditional cost accounting methods, including ratio of costs to charges and relative value units. Weaknesses of traditional methods include approaching costs through the lens of charges, revenue, processes and procedures, adopting a "top-down" approach, and potentially overestimating costs. In contrast, TDABC builds costs from the individual level, taking a front-line, condition-focused, and patient-centered view. Existing organizational decision-making is oriented around revenue metrics (relative value units and ratio of costs to charges) rather than cost metrics, yet alternative payment models are shifting toward fixed revenues for certain conditions or procedures. The variability, including both financial upside and loss, will primarily be a function of the cost of care-a number that is profoundly opaque in most health care settings. We view TDABC as an approach that sheds light on variation, offers a more granular differentiation of costs compared with traditional approaches, mitigates risk, and sparks opportunities for increasing operational efficiency and waste reduction. The goal is to identify and provide the greatest-value orthopaedic care.

A Strategic Approach to Introducing New Technology Into Orthopaedic Practices.

Orthopaedic surgeons have a strong legacy for the early of adoption of new technologies that promise to advance patient care. Such technologies are being developed at an extraordinary pace, leveraging advances in orthobiologics and cartilage restoration, surgical navigation, robotic surgery, 3-D printing, and manufacturing of customized implants and sensors. The functionality provided by this revolution is impressive, promising substantial benefits for patients. However, the value of these technologies resides not in their "newness" but in the ability to improve outcomes for patients and reduce overall costs of care. Deciding whether a new technology brings value to an orthopaedic practice can be difficult, especially in an environment of rising health care costs, abundant choice, competition, consumer pressures, variable quality in supporting data, and a shifting regulatory landscape. In this article, we explore the drivers for orthopaedic companies, institutions, and care providers to develop, evaluate, and incorporate new technology. We outline the technology innovation cycle and the major demographic and psychosocial characteristics of adopter groups. We introduce factors considered in evaluating new technologies, such as patient safety, product efficacy, regulatory issues, and their value. Finally, we summarize the ethical concerns associated with new technology, alongside education and training, network security, financial remuneration and informed consent. This article aims to empower orthopaedic surgeons with a balanced and critical approach to ensure the adoption of new technologies in a safe, effective, and ethical manner.

The impact of a patient's engagement in their health on the magnitude of limitations and experience following upper limb fractures.

AIMS: Patient engagement in adaptive health behaviours and interactions with their healthcare ecosystem can be measured using self-reported instruments, such as the Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13) and the Effective Consumer Scale (ECS-17). Few studies have investigated the influence of patient engagement on limitations (patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs). First, we assessed whether patient engagement (PAM-13, ECS-17) within two to four weeks of an upper limb fracture was associated with limitations (the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH), and Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Upper Extremity Physical Function computer adaptive test (PROMIS UE PF) scores) measured six to nine months after fracture, accounting for demographic, clinical, and psychosocial factors. Secondly, we assessed the association between patient engagement and experience (numerical rating scale for satisfaction with care (NRS-C) and satisfaction with services (NRS-S) six to nine months after fracture. METHODS: A total of 744 adults with an isolated fracture of the proximal humerus, elbow, or distal radius completed PROMs. Due to multicollinearity of patient engagement and psychosocial variables, we generated a single variable combining measures of engagement and psychosocial factors using factor analysis. We then performed multivariable analysis with p < 0.10 on bivariate analysis. RESULTS: Patient engagement and psychosocial factors combined to form a single factor (factor 1) accounting for 20% (QuickDASH, semi-partial R2 = 0.20) and 14% (PROMIS UE PF, semi-partial R2 = 0.14) of the variation in limitations six to nine months after fracture. Factor 1 also accounted for 17% (NRS-C, semi-partial R2 = 0.17) of variation in satisfaction with care, and 21% (NRS-S, semi-partial R2 = 0.21) of variation in satisfaction with services. Demographic factors (age, sex, work status) and measures of greater pathophysiology (type of fracture, high-energy injury, post-surgical complications), accounted for much less variation. CONCLUSION: Patients who actively manage their health and demonstrate effective emotional and social functioning share a common underlying trait. They have fewer limitations and greater satisfaction with care during recovery from upper limb fractures. Future efforts should focus on evaluating initiatives that optimize patient engagement, such as patient education, coaching, and a communication strategy for healthcare professionals. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(1):42-47.

What Are the Uses and Limitations of Time-driven Activity-based Costing in Total Joint Replacement?

BACKGROUND: With increasing emphasis on value-based payment models for primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA), there is greater need for orthopaedic surgeons and hospitals to better understand the actual costs and resource use of TJA. Time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) is a methodology for accurate cost estimation, but its application in the TJA care pathway across institutions/regions has not yet been analyzed. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: In this systematic review of studies applying TDABC to primary TJA, we investigated the following: (1) Is there variation in TDABC methodology and cost estimates across institutions? (2) Is a standard set of direct and indirect costs included across studies? (3) Is there a difference in cost estimates derived from TDABC and traditional hospital cost-accounting approaches? and (4) How are institutions using TDABC (process and outputs) with respect to the TJA care pathway? METHODS: A comprehensive search strategy was developed that included the keywords "TDABC," "time-driven activity-based cost," "THA," "TKA," "THR," "TKR," and "TJR" in the PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Ovid SP, Scopus, and ScienceDirect databases for articles published between 2004 and 2018 as well as extensive hand searching and citation mining. Relevant studies (n = 15) were screened to include THA or TKA as the focus of the TDABC model, full-text articles, TDABC-based cost estimates for TJA, and studies written in English (n = 8). Due to the heterogeneity of outcomes/methodology in TDABC studies involving TJA, quality assessment was based on each study's adherence to the seven steps delineated by Kaplan et al. in their original publication introducing TDABC in health care. RESULTS: There was substantial variation in TDABC methodology (especially in scope), adherence to the seven steps of TDABC, and data collection. Only five of eight studies incorporated indirect costs into their TDABC calculation, with notable differences in which direct and indirect expenses were included. TDABC-based cost estimates for TJA ranged from USD 7081 to USD 29,557, with variation driven by the TJA timeframe and whether implant costs were included in the costing calculation. TDABC was most frequently used to compare against traditional hospital accounting methods (n = 4), to increase operational efficiency (n = 4), to reduce wasted resources (n = 3), and to mitigate risk (n = 3). CONCLUSIONS: TDABC-based cost estimates are more granular and useful in practice than those calculated via traditional hospital accounting; however, there is a lack of standardized principles to guide TDABC implementation (especially for indirect costs) due to institutional and regional differences in TDABC application. Although TDABC methodology will likely continue to vary somewhat between studies, standardized principles are needed to guide the definition, estimation, and reporting of costs to enable detailed examination of study methodology and inputs by readers. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, economic and decision analysis.

Public priorities for osteoporosis and fracture research: results from a general population survey.

This is the first national study of public and patient research priorities in osteoporosis and fracture. We have identified new research areas of importance to members of the public, particularly 'access to information from health professionals'. The findings are being incorporated into the research strategy of the National Osteoporosis Society. PURPOSE: This study aimed to prioritise, with patients and public members, research topics for the osteoporosis research agenda. METHODS: An e-survey to identify topics for research was co-designed with patient representatives. A link to the e-survey was disseminated to supporters of the UK National Osteoporosis Society (NOS) in a monthly e-newsletter. Responders were asked to indicate their top priority for research across four topics (understanding and preventing osteoporosis, living with osteoporosis, treating osteoporosis and treating fractures) and their top three items within each topic. Descriptive statistics were used to describe demographics and item ranking. A latent class analysis was applied to identify a substantive number of clusters with different combinations of binary responses. RESULTS: One thousand one hundred eighty-eight (7.4%) respondents completed the e-survey. The top three items overall were 'Having easy access to advice and information from health professionals' (63.8%), 'Understanding further the safety and benefit of osteoporosis drug treatments' (49.9%) and 'Identifying the condition early by screening' (49.2%). Latent class analysis revealed distinct clusters of responses within each topic including primary care management and self-management. Those without a history of prior fracture or aged under 70 were more likely to rate items within the cluster of self-management as important (21.0 vs 12.9 and 19.8 vs 13.3%, respectively). CONCLUSION: This is the first study of public research priorities in osteoporosis and has identified new research areas of importance to members of the public including access to information. The findings are being incorporated into the research strategy of the National Osteoporosis Society.